Who gets believed and why
I build institutions that question foundations.
Abuja to Kansas.
I'm a Nigerian philosophy and physics student at the University of Kansas. I build things when I think existing institutions aren't asking the right questions — a sports intelligence operation, investigative journalism, a platform about what happens to knowledge when AI can produce it cheaper than people can evaluate it. The thread connecting all of it: what makes a claim worth believing, and who decides.
Where the disciplines meet
Epistemology
Three semesters studying testimony, justification, and what happens when AI can generate content indistinguishable from human expertise. ~300 writing consultations at KU's Writing Center, watching the gap between compliance and understanding.
Epistemic Certainty
Measurement
Physics trained me to ask what you're actually measuring. Football analytics trained me to notice when nobody else is asking. STATSWING exists because those questions turn out to be the same question.
Contested Aerial Opportunities
Building
STATSWING covers 14,800+ players across 21 leagues — built in three weeks, one operator. Before that: investigative journalism, a Senate resolution, a public dashboard with 10,000+ visitors. The pattern: see a gap, build something that fills it.
Decision Architecture
What I've built
A pattern: encountering institutional failure and responding by investigating rather than accepting.
What gives a claim its epistemic weight when AI can generate identical content? Essays on knowledge, testimony, and the future of authorship.
Coming soonSelected writing
Connecting ideas
Hover to explore how concepts thread through the writing. Click an article to read it.
Ideas
Concepts that show up across the research, the scouting, and the investigations. Click one to see where it appears.
Find me
The work continues
If you're building something that questions its own foundations, or if you think I should be questioning yours — I'd like to hear from you.
Abuja. Johannesburg. Lawrence.