# Deducing a Player's Fit From Their Tackling Mechanics > For the full version with images, embedded tweets, and visual breakdowns, [visit BallerzBantz](https://www.ballerzbantz.com/p/tackling). ### Background Coaches and scouts project players' skillset and how they might align with their specific game model. While discussions abound on statistics, the biomechanics behind these attributes often go unnoticed. ### Methodology To understand how a player's tackling mechanics can indicate suitability for different game models: 1. From which angles and at what proximity can the player effectively tackle? 2. What usually happens post-tackle? Is the ball retained, does it go out of bounds, or loose? 3. What kind of physical and mental exertion does the action require? ### Case Study: Kyle Walker vs Aaron Wan-Bissaka **Kyle Walker**: Contests with both hands then uses frame to gain advantage. Post-tackle, most often retains the ball. Approach is sprint-intensive — demands equivalent stamina. **Ideal Fit**: Last line of defense for a team that thrives on retaining possession. **Aaron Wan-Bissaka**: Challenges on the ground using either foot from various angles. Post-tackle, ball usually goes out of bounds (deeper) or ends up loose (higher). Susceptible to physical challenges, taking knocks, occasionally trampled. **Ideal Fit**: Catenaccio-style defense aiming to disrupt rhythm. Also apt for aggressive pressing scheme or insurer role in rest-defense. ### Feed-Forward: Translating Mechanics into Scouting Reports 1. Pre-execution analysis: approach and readiness. 2. The mechanics of the tackle and areas of improvement. 3. The outcome post-tackle. 4. Suitable fit based on specific game models and strategies. --- ## Related - [[Dribbling Framework]] - [[Why Mechanics Matter]] - [[Aerials]] - [[Ahmedhodžić]]